敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
申洋洋,陈志超,胡 昊,盛 莉,周洪奎,娄卫东,沈阿林.基于无人机多时相遥感影像的冬小麦产量估算[J].麦类作物学报,2021,(10):1298
基于无人机多时相遥感影像的冬小麦产量估算
Estimation of Winter Wheat Yield Based on UAV Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Image
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2021.10.14
中文关键词:  无人机多光谱数据  小麦产量  统计分析  机器学习算法
英文关键词:UAV multi-spectral data  Wheat yield  Statistical analysis  Machine learning algorithm
基金项目:国家重点研发项目(2018YFD0200507)
作者单位
申洋洋,陈志超,胡 昊,盛 莉,周洪奎,娄卫东,沈阿林 (1.河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院河南焦作 4540002.浙江省农业科学院数字农业研究所浙江杭州 3100213.浙江省农业科学院环境资源与土壤肥料研究所浙江杭州 310021) 
摘要点击次数: 478
全文下载次数: 461
中文摘要:
      为高效准确地预测小麦产量,以浙江省冬小麦为研究对象,利用四旋翼无人机精灵4多光谱相机获取冬小麦5个关键生育时期(拔节期、孕穗期、抽穗期、灌浆期、成熟期)的冠层多光谱数据,选取多光谱相机的五个特征波段计算各生育时期的72个植被指数,分别通过逐步多元线性回归(SMLR)、偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)、BP神经网络(BPNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)构建不同生育时期的产量估算模型,最后采用决定系数(R)、均方根误差(RMSE)和相对误差(RE)对估算模型进行评价,筛选出最优估算模型。结果表明,基于随机森林建立的模型估算效果最优,SMLR、PLSR和SVM三种方法建立的模型估算效果接近。利用随机森林算法所建拔节期、孕穗期、抽穗期、灌浆期、成熟期模型的R、RMSE和RE分别为0.92、0.35、11%;0.93、0.33、10%;0.94、0.32、9%;0.92、0.36、9%;0.77、0.67、33%。模型验证时,抽穗期估算效果最好(R、RMSE和RE分别为0.91、0.35和15%),拔节期、孕穗期、灌浆期估算效果接近且有很好的估算能力,成熟期估算精度最差(R、RMSE和RE分别为0.71、0.47和13%)。由此说明,结合机器学习算法和无人机多光谱提取的植被指数可以提高小麦产量估算效果。
英文摘要:
      In order to efficiently and accurately predict wheat yield,winter wheat in Zhejiang province was taken as research object.Canopy multi-spectral data at five key growth stages (jointing stage,booting stage,heading stage,grain filling stage,and maturity stage)of winter wheat was obtained by using multispectral sensor onboard the four-rotor Phantom 4 UAV. Five characteristic bands of multispectral camera were selected to calculate 72 vegetation indices at different growth stages. The yield estimation models at different growth stages were constructed by stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR),partial least squares regression (PLSR),BP neural network (BPNN),support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). Finally,the coefficient of determination (R),root mean square error (RMSE) and relative error (RE) were used to evaluate the estimation model and select the best estimation model. The results showed that the model based on RF has the best estimation effect,and the models based on SMLR,PLSR and SVM have similar estimation effect. The R,RMSE and RE of the models at jointing stage,booting stage,heading stage,grain filling stage and maturity stage were 0.92,0.35,11%; 0.93,0.33,10%; 0.94,0.32,9%; 0.92,0.36,9%; 0.77,0.67,33%,respectively. In the validation of the model,the estimation effect at heading stage was the best (R,RMSE and RE were 0.91,0.35 and 15%,respectively),and the estimation effect at jointing stage,booting stage and grain filling stage was close and had good estimation ability,and the estimation accuracy at maturity stage was the worst (R,RMSE and RE were 0.71,0.47 and 13%,respectively). Therefore,the combination of machine learning algorithm and UAV multispectral extraction of vegetation index can improve the effect of wheat yield estimation.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第19756767位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计