敬告作者朋友
最近我们发现,有一些假冒本刊在线投稿系统的网站,采用与《麦类作物学报》相似的网页、网址和邮箱发送征稿通知以及收取审稿费、版面费的信息,以骗取钱财。详细情况见【通知公告】栏的“再次提醒作者朋友:谨防上当受骗!!!”

关闭
刘丽华,庞斌双,王立新,李宏博,张 欣,蔡金麟,赵昌平.醇溶蛋白法和SSR标记法检测小麦种子纯度的比较[J].麦类作物学报,2013,33(3):429
醇溶蛋白法和SSR标记法检测小麦种子纯度的比较
Comparison of Seed Purity Detection of Wheat Using Gliadin Analysis and SSR Markers
  
DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2013.03.04
中文关键词:  小麦  种子纯度  SSR标记  醇溶蛋白  田间表型鉴定
英文关键词:Wheat  Seed purity  SSR markers  Gliadin analysis  Field phenotypic identification
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD35B03); 农业部农产品质量安全监督(种子管理)项目;北京市农林科学院青年科研基金项目(QNJJ201003,QNJJ201006)。
作者单位
刘丽华,庞斌双,王立新,李宏博,张 欣,蔡金麟,赵昌平 (北京市农林科学院 / 北京杂交小麦工程技术研究中心,北京 100097) 
摘要点击次数: 1842
全文下载次数: 1407
中文摘要:
      为了比较SSR标记法和醇溶蛋白法检测小麦种子纯度的准确度,以参加冬小麦区域试验的8个品系为试材,利用SSR标记法和醇溶蛋白法分别检测8个品系中的杂株,以田间表型鉴定结果为对照。结果表明,在800个单株(每个品系取100个单株)中,醇溶蛋白法和SSR标记法分别检出44和55个杂株,田间表型鉴定出49个杂株。这49个杂株中,有41株同时被SSR标记法和醇溶蛋白法鉴定出来,另有8株仅被SSR标记法鉴定出来。证明SSR标记法检测小麦种子纯度较醇溶蛋白法更加准确。
英文摘要:
      Seed purity is an important criterion for evaluating seed quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).In this study,in order to compare the accuracy of testing seed purity of wheat using SSR molecular markers and gliadin analysis ,the seed purity of eight wheat lines selected from the 2008-2009 regional trial of winter wheat was tested based on 100 individual plants per line.Forty four and fifty five contaminated plants were detected by the gliadin analysis and the SSR markers,respectively.The testing efficiency was 20% higher by SSR markers than by gliadin analysis.The field phenotypic identification,which was conducted as the control,revealed forty nine abnormal plants,of which forty one abnormal plants were identified by both SSR markers and gliadin analysis,the other eight plants were identified only by SSR markers.This result indicated that SSR analysis was more sensitive and reliable than gliadin analysis in seed purity test.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第19570670位访问者
版权所有麦类作物学报编辑部
京ICP备09084417号
技术支持: 本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计